Your Money – In Defense of Home Ownership

August 30th, 2010

This week, the National Association of Realtors announced that existing-home sales in July had fallen an astounding 25.5 percent from the previous year. Sure, there was a federal tax credit in place last summer. But with single-family home sales at their lowest level since 1995 and unemployment still stubbornly high, home prices may fall further.

In the meantime, millions of homeowners are still far underwater, and government programs to help them have fallen well short of their goals. More foreclosures are coming, casting a deeper shadow over home prices. So it’s hardly surprising that the conventional wisdom says that home values will never again rise faster than inflation.

But as with stocks and the weather, it is dangerous to assume any certainty in the housing market. And by wallowing too much in the misery of others, people looking for a new place to live run the risk of thinking every home purchase will end in regret, at least financially.

Many still could, if they buy in hard-hit areas where prices could fall further.

But a mortgage is still a form of long-term forced savings, after all. This is more important than ever, since fewer people have access to generous pensions than they did during the last big housing slump. A 401(k) or similar plan is no bargain, either, with its erratic returns and employer matches that come and go as the economic winds shift. Social Security is also likely to be less generous, and Medicare will probably cost more.

Besides, owning a home isn’t just about what shows up on a net worth statement — something that bears repeating after all the “investing” that people thought they were doing when buying homes over the last 10 or 15 years. Many of these more qualitative factors, from living free of a landlord’s whim to having access to a good school district or retirement community, haven’t changed and probably never will.

It is possible, as a homeowner, to make very little money but still buy plenty of happiness. So before you swear off real estate, reconsider a few of the basics.

WORST CASES Some buyers may rue the day in 2010 they bought their homes. They may end up like those who bought in 2006 and have lost their jobs. Now those people face the difficulty of moving to pursue employment elsewhere because they owe much more than their homes are worth.

Marke Hallowell and Allison Firmat, who are getting married next month, are well aware of the history. Yet they plan to put 5 percent or less down, using a fixed-rate mortgage backed by the Federal Housing Administration, once they find a condominium in southern Orange County, Calif. (They’ve already been outbid a few times.)

Ms. Firmat is not working, and Mr. Hallowell is a Web developer. Does he worry about mobility problems or making the payments in the event of a job loss, given that he’s the sole breadwinner? “We’re getting such a good deal on interest rates that we could rent our place out,” he said.

Mr. Hallowell and Ms. Firmat say they believe their approach is conservative, at least compared to what they might have done five years ago.

“Nothing is going to change the rate we will have,” Mr. Hallowell said. “Condos like the ones we’re looking at now were unobtainable in the past, unless we went into something with a total balloon payment. There were times I was tempted, but never seriously.”

Indeed, many people who are buying at the moment are locking in mortgage rates of about 4.5 percent. A year ago, they might have paid 5.25 percent on a $300,000 loan for a monthly payment of about $1,657. Today, you could lock in a lower monthly payment of around $1,520 on a mortgage that size, or you might not need to borrow that much, given that prices have fallen in many areas.

FORCED SAVINGS You may make nothing at all beyond inflation over time on a home, but the part of your mortgage payment that goes toward principal is a form of forced savings.

Sure, you might do better by renting and investing the difference between the rent and the total costs of ownership. But at least three things need to go right.

First, you need to actually save the money. Americans have trouble with that sort of plan. Then, you need an after-tax return that’s better than whatever a home would deliver. That’s a task that might not have gone so well over the last 10 or 12 years, and it involves its own future risk, given how little safer investments are returning now. Finally, you must not raid the savings along the way.

DIFFICULT LANDLORDS A bank can kick you out only if you don’t pay your mortgage. But landlords can drive you away in any number of ways.

Laura Mapp and her husband, Carl Berg, rented from a relative, but it didn’t go particularly well. They found another landlord they liked, but came back from a holiday trip one year to a note saying he wanted to move in himself. They had a month to scram. (The note came with a bottle of wine, at least.)

In yet another rental, they let their landlord know they were looking to buy and inquired about a month-to-month lease. No problem, their landlord said, as long as they used his boyfriend as their real estate agent.

Earlier this year, the couple gave up on landlords and bought a house in the Highland Park neighborhood in Seattle.

THE NICE PART OF TOWN No matter how pretty the neighborhood, prices may still fall further in places like greater Detroit, Cleveland and Las Vegas; outlying areas of Los Angeles, San Francisco and Phoenix; and much of Florida. If you’re looking elsewhere, consult The Times’s rent-versus-buy calculator, halfway down the page at nytimes.com/yourmoney.

But if you want to live in the Fox Hill Farm development in Glen Mills, Pa., you’ll have to buy because renters are not allowed, said Bob Kuhn, who lives there. The same may be true of other communities for older people.

And there may not be many family-size rentals — or at least any financial edge to be gained by renting — in suburbs or urban neighborhoods with excellent public schools.

After many years of building their down-payment fund and a couple of years of watching the listings in the Eagle Rock and Mount Washington areas of Los Angeles, Garret and Alison Williams realized that prices simply were not falling much there.

By the time they were ready to pounce this year, they had a big enough down payment and interest rates had fallen so far that renting didn’t make much financial sense, even if they could have found a rental big enough for them and their two small children.

“Had we rented, we would be paying more than we’re paying for a mortgage,” said Ms. Williams, who had lived in the same two-bedroom rental for 12 years before she and her family moved into their new house in Eagle Rock earlier this month. “I don’t see how we could really regret having made the move when it’s so much better for us on so many levels.”

This is a very even handed assessment of whether you should be buying a home right now.

Posted via email from Joe Pryor’s posterous

It’s a great day to invest in Oklahoma City real estate

August 29th, 2010

Oklahoma City real estate has been resilient the last two years but we are now in the midst of a market correction. Pirices are headed down but not by much so why would it be a good time to buy real estate? First I hate the cliche “it is a great day to buy or sell real estate”. It is not universally true for all people at all times. If you are having to do a short sale to avoid foreclosure then it is not a great day. If you are a buyer who would need to max out your savings to buy a home it is not a great day. However, if you are an investor in real estate for rental income it is a great day, especially in Oklahoma City and here are the reasons why.

Number One. Buyers are in short supply. This not only means homes are not selling, it means more people are needing rent homes instead of buying them. More renters affects the supply and demand and demand is very high. If you ask my main property manager about Edmond, Oklahoma rental real estate he will tell you that if I could sell 100 more homes there he could rent them.

Number Two. Short sale properties are increasing. Short sales are one of the safest bets to buy for investment. For instance, I have a home in Edmond that is a 4 bedroom home short sale in excellent condition. It could be purchased for $120,000. I have already asked my property manager what it could rent for and he said $1250. If I estimate a full payment that would come to $850 which means that before property management fees you would have $400 a month npositive cash flow, and Edmond runs at a 5% vacancy rate. Who doesn’t love low risk high return.

Number Three. It is getting more expensive to buy so more potential buyers stay out of the market. On October 4th FHA raises it’s mortgage insurance rate and decreases from 6% to 3% the maximum allowable closing cost that a seller can contribute. Alos statistics show that average buyer closing cost have increased 37% this year. It is also diificult to get anything less than 10% down on a conventional loan so again fewer buyers, better rental makret.

Number Four. Oklahoma City is holding its values overall and is a stable market. This year it was announced by RealtyTrac that Oklahoma had the lowest underwater mortgages in the country at 5.9% which means that fewer homes are in danger of default. Contrast this with Nevada at around 70%, Florida and Arizona at around 50% and you can see this difference between a stable housing market and a volitile one.Exptect large swings in the next few years in those states and a loiw number in ours. It is important that you preserve your values.

Number Five. We have the team that is a complete package. I have been specializing in Oklahoma City investment real estate for the last 16 years of my real estate career. I have mortgage bankers, inspectors, insurance agents, and mot importantly property managers that can handle every aspect of Oklahoma City investment real estate. We can compute your return on investment to make sure it is a good buy, check the house out compeltely to handle any deferred maintenance items up front, and have first class property managers who know how to screen renters, push the rental rates higher, and keep you vacancy low.

It is a great day to buy real estate in Oklahoma City if you are an investor. We have short sales, owner carry mortgages of existing and already rented homes, and small commercial that is fully occupied. Let us know how we can help you create wealth by investing long term in bricks and mortar real estate in the Oklahoma City area.

What is the Oklahoma City Foreclosure Tipping Point?

August 28th, 2010

Oklahoma City foreclosure rateOklahoma City real estate in the first two years following the 2007 meltdown was holding its values and because we were in recovery in the first part of the 21st Century versus a bubble, we were not burdened with the meltdown that came from overpriced property and the subprime lending industry that supported this madness. In 2007 Forbes also published a survey calling Oklahoma City “The most recession proof city in the U.S. Unemployment was at 3.4%, the energy industry was poised to take off, so it looked like we were an oasis of stability in a world gone haywire.

Now it is 2010, as like Shakepeare said, “now is the winter of 0ur discontent”. The recession has finally arrived. As I have said before in previous posts, this does not look like a meltdown rather a market correction of 5% to 10%. Many cities would be happy if that was all that happened but there is somewhere a tipping point, and this is where small changes create bigger ones. The number of houses that will go into foreclosure in the next six months can well determine if that 5% to 10% has a tipping point that creates a 20% loss in value. This would be the scenario of events that could make this happen and no one can say at what point this could occur, it just will.

1. Large inventories with few buyers. in the last ten years I have not seen supply and demand more ciricial in analysis. Too many properties create lower prices as homeowners chase too few buyers.

2. The crash of easy money.   Even though we didn’t have subprime in large quantities we had easy credit with 100% to even 125% financing. It can take one gusr of bad economic wind and these homeowners fall like a house of cards. These homes then become short sales or foreclosures being sold at less than an owner in good standing can sell for.

3. Tougher qualifying for loans. Credit rating, cash reserves, down payments, all are taking buyers out of the market place. I am not advocating a return to an open cash register model, it is just a fact. The problem is also enhanced by no one laoning with FHA on the 10% down 580 credit score program. Yes it was a good idea but if no one will do it that doesn’t matter.

4. Builders going out of business.  When times were good bankers had an open checkbook policy with builders and many of these are now out of business. Why? They spent large amount of money on themselves, did’nt plan for a rainy day, and ran their business like a real estate Ponzi scheme by believing that the banks would always give them more money and they could pay off the old loans and catch up later. The banks did the opposite and shut them off, and now that foreclosed inventory is flooding the market and we will see more of these next year.

5. REALTORS® who can’t do short sales. This is the point where I blame my industry. A very small fraction know how to do short sales but try anyway. I have an expeirenced and successful short sale team so this makes me extremely angry at how unethical this is. Daily I see homes going to auction because REALTORS® didn’t know what they were doing. Short sales have less of an impact of values than foreclosures which add another 10% to 15% to a price reduction. Our industry better get educated and fast.

6. Now for the Tipping Point. Here is how it happens. Yoo many people have lost jobs or had financial problems and need to sell. They are on the edge of being able to pay off the mortgage with what equity is left. Then you have a market correction that let’s say is 10% downward. Now we are talking a 5 figure deficit that a distressed homeowner does not have. Taking Oklahoma City real estate expired listings for example, I would compute that less than 10% of short sales are successful, and that means more foreclosures. More foreclosures affect appraisal values and then you have a snowball that adds more to its volume as it goes downhill and picks up speed because of the mass. What could keep this from happening?

Probably more government intervention which I don’t expect but hope for. Easing of the cash requirements for investors that have taken them out of the market. FHA not putting into effect on October 4th the increase in mortgage insurance cost and the reduction in seller paid closing cost allowance. Increased employment, a rise in the price of natural gas, a return to increased demand for goods and services all would lessen the effect of this Tipping Point. I will be updating what is going on monthly so stay tuned.

If you are a distressed homeowner in the Oklahoma City area and need a professional short sale team to help youa void foreclosure call us. For a quick guide to your options you can also go to our website, www.avoidforeclosureoklahoma.com.

How many Oklahoma REALTORS® does it take to make a sale?

August 27th, 2010

The answer just might surprise you. Thanks to our good friend in the industry, Jay Thompson known as The Phoenix Real Estate Guy we have an answer. The number of REALTORS in the U.S. is down to a little over 1 million, down from the 2006 high of 1.4 million and 58% are in 10 states. In my opinion that is heading in the right direction. Jay points out that Arizona has one REALTOR® for every 153 people. Oklahoma is 1 in 253. But that does not tell the true story.

Let’s take the Oklahoma population which is about 2.3 million people. We sit at about 9000 Realtors® most of them in the bigger cities. If we take the direct marketing statistic that says only 3% of the population at any time is ready to buy goods or services then the numbers become more interesting. That means only 69,000 people in our state are right now considering buying a home or selling their exsiting one. Rounding up that means we actually have 1 Realtor® for every 8 people rounding it up. NOw this is where it gets even more intersting. Stefan Swanepoel, one of the leading real estate authorities in our industry thinks that 93% of the business is being done by 7% of the REALTOR® population. This is a bit skewed becasue like many I have a team that counts on my numbers, so lets go to the old one tahr says 85% of business is being done by 15% so now let’s take those numbers and see where we are. Now we are looking at 8730 REALTORS® who are competing for the remaining 10,350 eligible buyers or sellers. So the question remain, how many Oklahoma REALTORS® does it take to make a sale. Or to phrase it differently, how many Oklahoma REALTORS® do we acutally need?

The answer is not this many. In 2006 the number was about 14,000 with a lot more people buying and selling. My prediction is the 5% loss in numbers we have had this year in our state will increase to another 10% gone by the end of 2011. This is not a bad thing because besides experienced REALTORS® who have been successful for a long time, we need new people, younger people who are up to date on social metworking, computer savvy, and eager to become entrepeneurs. If you are this kind of person, I would like to talk to you about a position on our team. We have the opportunite4s for you if you have the desire. Call me.

What is the future for Oklahoma City real estate?

August 25th, 2010

Since the housing meltdown that started in 2007, Oklahoma City has muddled along for the last three years, not crashing, but shrinking in both volume of sales and gross dollars. In 2008 Oklahoma City was declared the most recession proof city by Forbes magazine. The problem is most people ignored the most word that strated the statement and failed to understand that the depth of the recession was so great that eventually it would pull everyone in including us. So another way to say it is Oklahoma City will be one of the last to get pulled into the recession and that is currently what I believe is happening. Why?

First and foremost, unemployment. When that 2008 statement was announced our rate was at 3.5%, the lowest in the U.S. Now it sits at 6.9% which means we doubled the rate. No jobs, less people to buy houses. less people to spend money on things that support other employment. Second, a nagging redpendence on the energy industry. Natural Gas especially is the big part of what creates wealth and jobs here. We certainly have good and prudent companies but hiring is at a standstill, and what is increasing is our companies shutting down production and offices elsewhere and some are being relocated back.

What is going right? Not everything is negative otherwise Oklahoma City would be in the tank like many large cities. Government is strong. Having the State Capitol here helps. Tinker Air Force base also keeps grwoing and Boeing is bringing 550 engineering jobs here from California. Our cost of doing business is one of the lowest in the country so we remain attractive but we are not poised for dramatic growth but who is. Out MAPS projects 1-3 have revitalized the city and has done so without borrowing since it is done from sales tax.

So why is housing now starting to suffer? There are many reasons. Borrowing is harder for one. Full document requirements, tighter guidelines on appraisals, and the rise in loan requirements including money required and credit rating is dropping the number of buyers. When FHA starts it rise in mortgage insurance rates on October 4th that will also take buyers out of the system.  The tax credit also took buyers away from the normal time sequence. Since you had to be under contract by the end of April, May on showed a constant loss in the number of closed sales. We are alos seeing a greater number of foreclosures and short sales that affect a non-distressed buyer’s ability to get their price since this also affects appraisal values. Add to this that banks are not leniding to new construction builders at the previous rate and now we are seeing fewer starts in all areas of Oklahoma City.

Predictions. Last month sales in the Midwest region dropped 35%, and overall new home sales dropped 12.4% The preston report done monthly by an Edmond REALTOR® showed a 34% drop in our cities number one housing market. I have been calling for a 5% to 10% drop in overall values. which is a market correction not a meltdown. More new constuction workers are being laid off which hurts the employment rate. Greater numbers of foreclosures slow the market and turn it negative. Lack of demand ofor energy becasue of the worldwide sluggish economy will remain a drag on job creation here. In other words, it is not the time tos ell unless you need to sell. However, a buyer in 2011 could have the greatest buy in a lifetime. With dropping prices creating a greater degree of affordibility, and what looks like low interest rates remaining, it may be a good time to buy real estate. That could be the saving grace that keeps us from a dangerous tipping point where a certain percentage of foreclosures could drop values inough to start ensharing other homeowners in the negative equity range. We will have to wait and see which opposing force has the greatest strength.

If you are having trouble making your payments, and if you are facing bringing money to closing in order to sell, then you might talk to us about a short sale in order to avoid foreclosure in the Oklahoma City area. To get answers go to our short sale site which has a robust amount of information for you at www.avoidforeclosureoklahoma.com.

Oklahoma City real estate and the housing tax deduction

August 23rd, 2010

I have posted some excellent editorials in the last few days about what to expect for the housing market in the future. The important points are this: First, we had an aberration in the first decade of this century in how housing was viewed, used, and abused by banks, Wall Street, and to a lesser extent, homebuyers. Housing became the new road to wealth instead of the stock market, mutual funds, annuities, and the old fashioned savings account. Home ownership became one’s personal bank and for some crazy reason most people, government officials, and investment experts forgot that what goes up can come down, and it came crashingly down. In Oklahoma City we avoided the 80% bubble drops of Florida, California, Nevada, and Arizona, but our appreciation rate stopped dead in its tracks, and now we are having a bit of a sell off. I don’t see diusaster looming, but as Americans we are all in this together, and as the nation goes, so goes Oklahoma. In future post I am going to write from a local real estate experts opinion of what I see is governmental mistakes in reviving the housing market, and as one involved in the sale of homes by distressed homeowners  I have seen where I think money and emphasis should go to save people and keep them in their homes.

What I want to address today is the number one enemy that could kill home ownership right now, and the fear that D.C. doesn’t have a clue how to handle the problem. There is movement afoot to have naother way the American taxpayer and homeowner will shoulder the burden of government and the business worlds deceit, corruption, and the near collapse of the American financial system. They want to get rid of the tax deducution for homeownership.

If you read the editorials and if you follow real estate news you know we are back to the world of our fathers and mothers. This was a world where owning a home was a sign you had been responsible, and it was the American dream. My parents loved the home they bought in 1959, and 29 years later it was paid for, and we had a mortgage burning ceremoney, not uncommon in the 1970’s. The home did appreciate but that was just the icing on the cake, and the value of home ownership was augmented by the tax deduction for interest and property taxes so that it bgecame cheaper to own than to rent.

Now Congress is considering taking this away and at a time where appreciation if it happens is because markets reached the bottom and people are buying who can now afford a home at these prices and investors are buying for income properties.  Whatever appreciation has happened, it may be getting some areas back to pre-bubble prices not not a significant gain from those who still own property for 5 years or more.

I believe we will become a nation of renters if Congress does this. Unemployment is systemic and no one is predicting a turnaround until 2015 or later. I don’t believe we will see double digit appreciation in a normally restored market in my lifetime so homes will not become your personal ATM again. To that I say thank goodness. But of all times to consider eliminating the tax deduction this is absolutely the worst time possible. If it does come to pass a pox on both theri houses for Congress to take an easy way out and tiptoe past the banking and commerce lobby that wants to gut any proposal to restore normalcy unless the individaul American pays for it so the wealthy can keep on getting wealthier. For this I am very involved and I believe you should be too, If you are an Oklahoma City area homeowner please make your voice heard, this is important.

Editorial – Now, the Reform Rules

August 23rd, 2010

The new financial regulatory reform is supposed to curb the predatory lending practices that led to the collapse of the mortgage market and have put millions of Americans at risk of losing their homes.

The Federal Reserve must now translate the legislative language into rules that will govern how brokers, lenders, appraisers and investors behave from now on. Given the Fed’s long history of putting the financial industry first and consumer protection second, Congress will need to keep a close eye on the rule-making process.

It has become fashionable to blame profligate borrowers for the calamity. And there is no question that in the madness of the housing bubble, some people should never have sought mortgages or bought homes they clearly couldn’t afford. But the crisis was driven by Wall Street’s hunger for quick profits and its eagerness to buy mortgages and package them into securities. Banks, mortgage companies, brokers and appraisers all conspired to steer borrowers into loans with escalating interest rates, balloon payments and other conditions that made them highly prone to default.

The new law does not ban risky loans outright. It does establish several conditions that, if correctly implemented, should discourage lenders from issuing them.

Lenders must now take the common-sense precaution of documenting the borrower’s ability to pay. They can no longer penalize borrowers — eager to free themselves from subprime or other risky mortgages — for paying off the loans early. And lenders are forbidden to pay kickbacks — “yield spread premiums” — to brokers who push borrowers into costly, higher-interest loans.

If loans violate the law, borrowers will be able to stop a foreclosure and sue to recover damages. The risk of being hauled into court should persuade investors to look closer at the underlying loans to make sure that they conform with federal law.

These are all good, and desperately needed, reforms. Industry lobbyists, who do some of their best work in the rule-making phase, will work hard to water them down.

Consumer advocates are especially worried about how the Fed will formulate the rules that are supposed to stop lenders from steering creditworthy minority or female applicants into more expensive mortgages and end “wealth stripping,” under which lenders design loans that quickly rob homeowners of their equity.

Congressional leaders believe that the Fed was chastened by the crisis and will now do all that is needed to protect lenders. Given the agency’s long history of kowtowing to the banks, mortgage lenders and credit card companies, Congress will need to do more than trust. It will have to verify that the new rules finally give consumers — and the American economy — the strong, permanent protections they need.

This article comes at an interesting time for me. On September 9th, I am a part of a real estate industry roundtable at the Federal Reserve in Oklahoma City. We will be discussing the future of our industry and this should be a part of the discusiion.

Posted via email from Joe Pryor’s posterous

Real Estate’s Gold Rush Seems Gone for Good

August 23rd, 2010

The wealth generated by housing in those decades, particularly on the coasts, did more than assure the owners a comfortable retirement. It powered the economy, paying for the education of children and grandchildren, keeping the cruise ships and golf courses full and the restaurants humming.

More than likely, that era is gone for good.

“There is no iron law that real estate must appreciate,” said Stan Humphries, chief economist for the real estate site Zillow. “All those theories advanced during the boom about why housing is special — that more people are choosing to spend more on housing, that more people are moving to the coasts, that we were running out of usable land — didn’t hold up.”

Instead, Mr. Humphries and other economists say, housing values will only keep up with inflation. A home will return the money an owner puts in each month, but will not multiply the investment.

Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, estimates that it will take 20 years to recoup the $6 trillion of housing wealth that has been lost since 2005. After adjusting for inflation, values will never catch up.

“People shouldn’t look at a home as a way to make money because it won’t,” Mr. Baker said.

If the long term is grim, the short term is grimmer. Housing experts are bracing themselves for Tuesday, when the sales figures for July will be released. The data is expected to show a drop of as much as 20 percent from last year.

The supply of homes sitting on the market might rise to as much as 12 months, about twice the level of a healthy market. That would push down prices as all those sellers compete to secure a buyer, adding to a slide that has already chopped off as much as 30 percent in home values.

Set against this dismal present and a bleak future, buying a home is a willful act of optimism. That explains why Adam and Allison Lyons are waiting to close on a $417,500 house in Deerfield, Ill.

“We’re trying not to think too far ahead,” said Ms. Lyons, 35, an information technology manager.

The couple’s first venture into real estate came in 2003 when they bought a condo in a 17-unit building under construction in Chicago. By the time they moved in two years later, it was already worth $50,000 more than they had paid. “We were thinking, great!” said Mr. Lyons, 34.

That quick appreciation started them on the same track as their parents, who watched the value of their houses ascend for decades. The real estate crash interrupted that pleasant dream. The couple cannot sell their condo. Unwillingly, they are becoming landlords.

“I don’t think we’re ever going to see the prosperity our parents did, but I don’t think it’s all doom and gloom either,” said Mr. Lyons, a manager at I.B.M. “At some point, you just have to say what the heck and go for it.”

Other buyers have grand and even grander expectations.

In an annual survey conducted by the economists Robert J. Shiller and Karl E. Case, hundreds of new owners in four communities — Alameda County near San Francisco, Boston, Orange County south of Los Angeles, and Milwaukee — once again said they believed prices would rise about 10 percent a year for the next decade.

With minor swings in sentiment, the latest results reflect what new buyers always seem to feel. At the boom’s peak in 2005, they said prices would go up. When the market was sliding in 2008, they still said prices would go up.

“People think it’s a law of nature,” said Mr. Shiller, who teaches at Yale.

For the first half of the 20th century, he said, expectations followed the opposite path. Houses were seen the way cars are now: as a consumer durable that the buyer eventually used up.

The notion of housing as an investment first began to blossom after World War II, when the nesting urges of returning soldiers created a construction boom. Demand was stoked as their bumper crop of children grew up and bought places of their own. The inflation of the 1970s, which increased the value of hard assets, and liberal tax policies both helped make housing a good bet. So did the long decline in mortgage rates from the early 1980s.

Despite all these tailwinds, prices rose modestly for much of the period. Real home prices increased 1.1 percent a year after inflation, according to Mr. Shiller’s research.

By the late 1990s, however, the rate was 4 percent a year. Happy homeowners were taking about $100 billion a year out of their houses, which paid for a lot of good times.

“The experience we had from the late 1970s to the late 1990s was an aberration,” said Barry Ritholtz of the equity research firm Fusion IQ. “People shouldn’t be holding their breath waiting for it to happen again.”

Not everyone views the notion of real appreciation in real estate as a lost cause.

Bob Walters, chief economist of the online mortgage firm Quicken, acknowledges that the recent collapse will create a “mind scar” just as the Great Depression did. But he argues that housing remains unique.

“You have to live somewhere,” he said. “In three or four years, people will resume a normal course, and home values will continue to increase.”

All homes are different, and some neighborhoods and regions will rebound more quickly. On the other hand, areas where there was intense overbuilding, like Arizona, will be extremely slow to show any sign of renewal.

“It’s entirely likely that markets like Arizona will not recover even in the 15- to 20-year time frame,” said Mr. Humphries of Zillow. “The demand doesn’t exist.”

Owners in those foreclosure-plagued areas consider themselves lucky if they are still solvent. But that does not prevent the occasional regret that a life-changing sum of money was so briefly within their grasp.

Robert Austin, a Phoenix lawyer, paid $200,000 for his home in 2000. Five years later, his neighbors listed a similar home for $500,000.

Freedom beckoned. “I thought, when my daughter gets out of school, I can sell the house and buy a boat and sail around the world,” said Mr. Austin, 56.

His home is now worth about what he paid for it. As for that cruise, “it may be a while,” Mr. Austin said. Showing the hopefulness that is apparently innate to homeowners, he added: “But I won’t rule it out forever.”

I agree with much of the article. Oklahoma did not participate in the bubble boom of 2000-2007 because we were in recovery rather than oversupply, so we did not experience a meltdown, rather we are having a market correction at this time. However, appreciation will be very slow to come back in most areas, even here. Home ownenership will have to be based again on tax deduction, paying down the mortgage, and pride of personalization and control. Appreciation will be the icing on the cake once again, and that is not a bad thing.

Posted via email from Joe Pryor’s posterous

Editorial – Foreclosures Grind On

August 20th, 2010

In July, for the 17th month in a row, there were more than 300,000 foreclosures filings, including default notices, auction notices and bank repossessions, according to RealtyTrac, a marketer of foreclosed properties. Over the past eight months, bank repossessions have surged. In July, 92,858 homes were repossessed.

As repossessed homes are put up for sale, house prices are likely to fall further. As prices fall, more borrowers end up “underwater” — owing more on their mortgages than their homes are worth. That’s a big risk factor for default, especially when coupled with high unemployment. Moody’s Economy.com estimates that 1.9 million homes will be lost this year, down only slightly from 2 million in 2009.

Unfortunately, there is no evidence that the Obama administration’s efforts to address the foreclosure problem will make an appreciable dent. Its main program — which pays lenders to modify bad loans — was started over a year ago. So far, only 398,198 loans have been permanently modified. Of the $30 billion allotted to the program, only $321 million has been spent so far.

Part of the problem is poor administration. Homeowners, who apply to their bank or mortgage service company, complain about confusing procedures and lost paperwork. Banks have complained of frequent rule changes from the government.

Obama administration officials have blamed the banks for poor customer service while also arguing that this is inherently difficult to manage; lenders have had to establish new systems and hire people to undertake difficult case-by-case analyses to determine who qualifies for a loan modification. The program’s inspector general recently faulted the Treasury Department for failing to set clear goals and benchmarks for the program.

Another big problem is that many lenders, whose participation in the program is voluntary, have been reluctant to aggressively rework bad loans. Reducing a loan’s principal balance — rather than lowering interest levels or extending payout periods — is often the best chance of keeping underwater borrowers in their homes. Banks have been loath to accept the bigger losses that come with lowering principal. Fearing that banks will drop out of the program altogether, the Treasury has not pushed them hard enough.

The administration has recently begun other, more promising antiforeclosure efforts. So far, they are too small to make a big difference. A total of $4.1 billion has been committed this year for state-based efforts to help unemployed or underwater borrowers in 18 states (and the District of Columbia) that have been hit especially hard by joblessness and falling house prices. About $2 billion worth of projects have been approved and are expected to help 140,000 borrowers.

State efforts to help the unemployed may be easier to implement because they are more likely to involve temporary cash assistance to help pay mortgages, rather than loan modifications. Helping underwater borrowers achieve principal reductions, however, may prove as difficult on the state level as it has been in the federal program.

If these initial state-based efforts are successful, the administration must keep expanding them. The nation badly needs an antiforeclosure plan that is, finally, up to the scale of the problem.

First, as someone who works with distressed homeowners, loan modifications are just a divice to kick the foreclosure down the road, it only adds more pricinciple so when the trial period is over the payment is higher and since the old lower payment was not being made then the foreclosure is ususally a sure thing. Second, I blame the real estate business. REALTORS® who don’t know the first thing about short sales are trying to do them. The banks are plagued with incomplete paperwork, multiple offers which is improper, and lack of follow up. This clogs the system and slows down the complete and accurate packets for distressed homeowners and puts them in jeopardy.

Posted via email from Joe Pryor’s posterous

Will Oklahoma City real estate make a market correction in 2011?

August 18th, 2010

Oklahoma City was fortunate that it did not get caught in the subprime mortgage meltdown that started at the end of 2007. While much of the country was experiencing a real estate bubble in housing prices, Oklahoma City was in a recovery mode that had come from our regional meltdown caused by an energy bubble that burst in 1982. Consdiering that this current bubble is worldwide and more severe than the energy one , there is no reason to believe that we are out of danger. But Oklahoma City did not have many underwater mortgages, in fact we are one of the lowest in the country. But other problems I believe will cause a market correction in Oklahoma City real estate and here are the reasons I believe it will happen.

1. Easy Credit  Many people obtained 100% and more loans on new and exisiting homes. There was not the strict qualification process, appraisers made everything work, and people believed that market cycles don’t happen. The problem is they did, and one small economic hardship was a tipping point in causing many mortgages to go into default.

2. Equity second mortgages   It was also easy to obtain an equity line of credit to add a pool, buy a boat, or whatever you wanted. This put the homeowner over the value with the combined debt. Both 1 and 2 are causing more foreclosures to occur that put a drag on the market. Since Oklahoma is a judicial state in sometimes takes a year or more to complete the foreclosure. These chicken are coming home to roost this year and next to drag down vaoues.

3. $8000 tax credit The tax credit got people buying homes out of sequence and not always making the best buys. Too many times I saw young people borrowing the down payment from relatives, asking sellers to pay closing cost, and then you wonder what happens to the $8000. Did they bank it or spend it on furniture. Foreclosures waiting to happen, and also we wenty into summer with high inventory and fewer buyers.

4. Rise in closing cost for loans Bankrate just reported that loan closing cost have gone up 37% in 2010 over 2009. This like a tax on borrowing and supposedly financial regulation was going to control the cost. If this is control I would hate to see what no control would look like.

5. FHA mortgage insurance going up On September 9th FHA is rasing the cost of insurance. This means if they do the minimum a $200K loan would mean $43 a month more. If they go to the mazimum soon which they are authorized to do it would be more like $234 a month and the equivalent of a 1.125% rise in rates. This means fewer buyers since FHA is dominating the mortgage market now.

6. Buyer and seller disconnect Buyers are afraid to buy and when they do they believe everything is a fire sale. Sellers on the otherhand look at comparable sales up to 6 months old and say but my price is appraisable. Problem is it is not the appraiser who is buying it. Sellers who have to sell and have real equity are going to need to meet some buyer demand, the buyer is in the drivers seat.

7. New home builder bankruptcies Too many builders ran their business as if it was a Ponzi scheme. Theya lways had a new start and a new draw to pay off the old loans while they lived off the draws. In our overbuilt market especially on the high end we are seeing many go out of business because the banks cut off their line of credit and said sell something first. These homes are on the way to the market now to create even more drag.

8. Systemic unemployment Oklahoma City again is better off but we have had a 40% increase in our unemplouyment rate in the last 3 years. We are also suceptable to national market trends so lack of demand dampens our market also.

I am not predicting a depression for our city, this is why I called it a market correction. The problem is defining what the tipping point is that would accelerate the drop. I am thinking that it should be in the % to 10% in loss of value which triggers even more foreclosures especially with those people who bought new homes since 2006 and did maximum financing since a new home is like buying a new car, it is worth less the day you buy it. If this is all we experience here then we should be grateful, but if you are an Oklahoma City area homeowner who is thinking of putting your home on the market ask yourself do I need to sell or want to sell. If you have to then we should see if you can get out even or if you need to do a real estate short sale. If you  just want to then be prepared to take less than what you think the house is worth. This is overall a buyers market.